top

Communities of practice online: Reflection through experience and experiment with the Webheads community of language learners and practitioners

Week 3

February 3 - 9, 2003

Issues Discussed in Week 3

 

 

 

cmc: computer-mediated-communication - part 1

definition?, bibliography, chat tools, chat for peer tutoring,

chat and language learning, getting started in online teaching

 

Part 2: pros and cons of chatcultural attitudes towards chat

 

Part 3: pros and cons of email exchanges, Wimba voice direct

 

 

 
2Feb03    
Hi all,

Sorry if this question is too obvious, But do you know any clear definition for CMC to give to an audience where perhaps there are many of them with almost no knowledge on Internet?

Thank you in advance,

María

 

 

 
3Feb03    
Maria,

Denise Murray has a great article in the Winter 2000 (I think) issue of
TESOL Quarterly in which she defines CMC for a non-tech-y TESOL
audience. She also has an article somewhere in Language Learning
Technology which is an online journal (www.llt.msu.edu -- if I remember
rightly).

The fact that she raises a critical voice has nothing at all to do with
my admiration of her writing, of course ...

Cheers,
Nigel

 

 

 
. . .

This coming week we will be focusing on the tools that facilitate computer mediated communication.  Maria asked for a clear definition of CMC and I guess I would say, as it applies to us and to language learning, it's using computers to put people in remote (from each other) locations in touch for the purpose of facilitating authentic and purposeful communication.  This is in fact the practice that our community revolves around, and one of our purposes is to explore various ways that we can effect CMC.

Don sez: "I'd been wondering what webcaming brings to an online CoP like ours.  As ScottLo said (via text I should point out) out: "it's fun."  Despite my disappointment, I agree.  It WAS fun to see faces "in motion" that I had only seen in stills on the community page before.  But I have to say it was infinitely better to hear people's voice and (almost) have conversations."

Michael: "And yes, we technophiles will keep trying. That is in part why Webheads exists. We keep trying these things and watch their progression. And we have seen voice technology progress from being a similarly frustrating not-worth-the-effort experience to something that is now acceptable. The same will happen with the use of video, and when it happens Webheads will be there!"

Someone in Tapped In last night asked, aren't we going to talk about CMC?

I once went to a Richie Havens concert (remember him, Woodstock?).  In the middle of the concert, he put aside his guitar and commenced a rambling monologue about the war in Vietnam.  About 5 min into that someone in the audience shouted, "Sing!".  Without missing a beat, he replied "I am singing!".

Excuse my rambling monologue, but what I'm trying to say is that CMC is what Webheads is all about, both a discussion of CMC tools, and more importantly, doing by trying them out on each other, and most importantly of all, communicating.  This is the importance of video and voice.  In addition to the text element where our thoughts are perhaps best conveyed, video and voice, for all their imperfections online, round out our communication.  They help us to convey who we are in three dimensions (text, voice, and video).  Video introduces our faces, our friends, our kids, and our surroundings.  Don hasn't experienced one of our guitar jams yet.  Talk about being underwhelmed, but I hope I'm getting across something of the nature of the almost inexplicable contribution that all these dimensions help us to convey about each other in an otherwise potentially flat virtual environment.

Try and join us next week in some of our multimedia virtual encounters ...

Vance

 

 

4Feb03
Here is my (presently unannotated) bibliography of research into CMC and SLA:
www.geocities.com/nigelcaplan/biblio.htm

As you'll see, I have spent rather more time looking up articles than designing
the website (I promise I didn't make it in MS Word just to annoy you all!), but
the text should be clear. A small number of the articles are available online,
but most (ironically) reside in paper-based journals, unless your institution
has subscribed to the electronic archives.

I should add that this is in no way complete, and does not include many of the
Webheads' excellent works (with the exception of Teresa's paper, which is
directly relevant). Also, I should say that I am highly critical of almost all
the studies (again, with the exception of Teresa's!). Hopefully, I'll get round
to editing and posting the lit review which explains why.

Anyway, if you're interested, there it is.

Cheers,
Nigel

 

 

 
Hi, Nigel:

This is going to be very useful, no doubt! And thanks for the great timing!
Just the right kind of resource for week 3!  :-)

Sadly, though, I was not able to get to your website: "Sorry, the page you
requested was not found".  :-(

Can you check and see if anything is wrong with the url, please? I don't
think it has to do with any problem at Geocities, because I can access Daf's
pages. Let us know, ok?

TIA,  Teresa

 

 

 
5Feb03
Hi Teresa,

Try the url with b capitalized:
www.geocities.com/nigelcaplan/Biblio.htm

I found this out by stripping the url to www.geocities.com/nigelcaplan and
navigating from Nigel's home page which then showed up.

Cheers, Arnold

 

 

 
Thank you, Arnold! I didn't think about that little, big difference!  ;-)

And thanks, Nigel! Biblios are always very useful and yours is no exception.
I will read the papers on the Web a.s.a.p. And thank you for including my
chat paper: an honor!

Cheers,  Teresa

 

 

 
OK, so the moral of the story is that file names are case sensitive in
geocities. My apologies - I honestly believed that nothing in a URL or
email address was ever case sensitive.

Thanks to Tere, Aiden and Arnold for sorting it out. As I only read the
daily digests, I'm a little behind.

Nigel

 

 

 
Hi, Jason, welcome to the friendliest online community of practice ever....;-) !!

We are all willing to listen to oldies and newbies and to share, as Tere has said, ideas, queries and experiences that can enrich us all.
Referring to our Week 3 discussion topic, which CMC tools have you used with your students? Which of them have you found more useful or successful in helping you achieve your aims? We have experimented with iVisit, Yahoo Messenger, some of us, with Paltalk, and most of us with our homely Tapped In 1 and 2, where we meet every Sunday at noon GMT, or Saturday 4 pm GMT.
 
I've personally added your ID to Yahoo; mine is ritazeinstejer, feel free to add me as well. I'm from Argentina, so my L1 is Spanish....

Look forward to meeting you

Rita

 

 

 
  Thanks for the warm welcomes! To answer Rita's
question, I use Yahoo messenger a lot and also ivisit.
With my students we have often gone to Latinchat.com
or similar chats so that they can do different types
of activities. Sometimes they are more structured than
others, and it depends a lot on their capabilities.
For lower-level classes, I like to do a scavanger hunt
activity in open chats with native speakers. For
instance, they make up a list of several
characteristics (things that usually come up in chats:
national origin, school, job, family, etc.) and then
they talk to various people until they have found all
of these. They have a lot of fun with that one and
usually make some friends with whom they become
penpals.

I found ivisit because I use macs a lot, but has
anyone here used www.ispq.com? It is not freeware but
it has a free trial. It has some things that ivisit
does not such as quick messaging that includes video
and voice. I have used a localizewd version of
PalTalk, Brasil's Tivejo.com, to learn a bit of
portuguese and I like the audio quality there a lot.

Again, thanks to all for the nice replies!

Jason

 

 

 
Hi, Jason!
It was a pleasure to contact you and share some English and some Spanish on Yahoo some minutes ago. And thanks for your quick reply and your promise to participate in our group...

I like the Scavenger Hunt you have used, and the follow up activity to integrate it to class work. Using the computer as a tool to enhance our f2f classes should be a must in all schools, but we still need to show many teachers how to, interchanging ideas, suggesting procedures and sites and different programs to exploit and adopt. There's so much to choose from! This is, in fact, our purpose this week, focused mainly on those tools which add voice and image to plain text, and which certainly make communication richer, more vivid and humane.

Has anybody else used www.ispq.com? Any experiences to share?
I also like Paltalk myself for its audio quality, but find iVisit difficult to move around, which would make it difficult to use with students as well.
Any other suggestions for their use in the classroom?

My best welcome to all contributions,

Rita

 

 

 
Hi all,

I just lost sight of Jason  in Yahoo Messenger, after we tried in
vain to find each other in iVisit.  Instead, Jason, read here and
learn why. I hope we can meet soon and continue the good work.

As you know, I was asked to update the iVisit software and could
not find information about how to reconfigure my connection for
iVisit after the reinstallation. As you, Jason is also a Mac user, I
was eager to explore iVisit with you , but did not manage to get
there this time. Instead I decided to share our little chat with the
list as an example on how the instant chat can be used for peer
tutoring - Jason needed a hand to find his way to the Photos
folder in our yahoo homepage, and I managed to guide him.
This is how we often use the chat  - as a parallel assistant
troubleshooting extra helpdesk area :-)

Sus

 

Read Susanne and Jason's log on chat and peer tutoring

 

 

 
6Feb03    
While working on a paper for Reading Online, I was
struck by the similarity of chat to Father Curran's
"counseling-learning" method, going back to the 1960s:

Curran, C.A. (1960; rpt. 1982). Community language
learning. Reprinted in R.W. Blair, (Ed)., Innovative
approaches to language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury
House.

To expand on this some, in CLL, a group of people
desiring to learn a language come together in a
circle. Facilitators surround them and "translate" for
group members, finding out what is intended to be
said, and whispering the words they need in their ear
as the group carries on a conversation. So the audible
conversation is in the target language, and it is
tape-recorded.

After class, the tape is transcribed as a script in
the target language that group members then read at
the beginning of the next group meeting. The
transcript thus becomes a point of departure for new
questions, conversations, grammatical explanations, et
al.

So learning of the language proceeds first of all by
the desires of the group members to say things of
importance to them, and then by the work of the
facilitators to help them express their ideas and
understand how that expression works in the target
language.

According to the research, several languages (up to
6?) have been learned and practiced simultaneously in
group sessions, depending on what the group wanted to
learn.

I participated in a group like this--a dinner party
with French, English, and Flemish as the languages
which flowed around the table. (Unfortunately, no one
made a transcript--the wine was flowing too freely.)
Chat seems very similar to me, because it depends on
what the chatters select as their topic(s), several
threads of conversation go on at the same time, and
there is a transcript to refer to later.  It happens
that WIA is teaching itself about technology in
language learning, but chat obviously is also used for
language learning itself.

Interesting that there is a respectable whole theory
of learning to back up chat, eh?

--Elizabeth

 

 

 
. . .
weblog from susnyrop's Site (http://www.xanga.com/susnyrop):
In the Los Angeles Times weekly UpdaTE newsletter , LATT (cool acronym),  I harvested a  link to this interesting article about what our bodies tell in the silent  mode.
Very relevant to understand - also when it comes to the lack of  non verbal communication in chat and other online contexts  - and how to interpretate our recent and ongoing  experiments with cheap webcams and freeware tools like Yahoo messenger and iVisit for our meetings.  Body language and job interview (http://www.latimes.com/classified/jobs/la-la_cbtms_20030202-1827329938feb02,0,5656512.story)

Sus

 

 

Hello everyone:

. . .

Presently, there is no online component to my teaching. Nor has there
been in the past, though I've used the computer to create audio,
video, and print materials for many of my classes. I am chomping at
the bit to try to incorporate some of the ideas that have been raised
in this group in my teaching.

What would be helpful for a newbie like me, if any of the regulars
have the time or inclination, is some sort of "getting started"
testimonial document. I'm sure what I have in mind has already been
done and I've just not looked hard enough on the various webpages that
have been referred to recently. But the sort of questions I have in
mind are: How does a teacher bring about the transformation from f2f
to online teaching? What are some of the obstacles and issues that
have been encountered in the process? What have been the high lights
as well as the "low lights" for you as you've made the move?

I don't imagine I'm alone in having a desire and a curiosity to try
some of the ideas out that have been raised here. I'm also probably
not alone in not having much of an idea as to how to bring this about.
Luckily for us newbies, many of you have already ventured down this
path. Your meaningful contributions to this group serve as a helpful
guide.

. . .

Thank you,
Scott Lockman

 

 

 
Hi, Scott,

. . .
You cannot imagine how much I sympathize with you when you wonder,

How does a teacher bring about the transformation from f2f
> to online teaching? What are some of the obstacles and issues that
> have been encountered in the process? What have been the high lights
> as well as the "low lights" for you as you've made the move?

Living in Argentina, a country where technology is still frowned upon by many educators, I often feel like giving up in my quest for changes. The concept of autonomous learning still being a laborious issue, there are proportionally very few teachers willing to plunge into new approaches entailing new attitudes in their realationship with students, who, in turn, should also be trained to understand the new concept, another strenuous barrier to surmount.

What do I do? I try to show something of what can be done, explaining, stressing advantages and benefits, selecting software that might look enticing and at the same time attainable and fruitful, from classical gap-filling, multiple choice activities embedded in Hot Lists and Scavenger Hunts, to more complex tasks aiming at the practice of the five skills --thinking included!, such as Webquests.
This does not mean teachers take to the new methodology at once, the process takes time and patience, and effort, as well.
 I have already upoaded an outline of the agenda I am preparing for this school year to our Yahoo cyberspace so that you --and anybody interested-- have an idea of the scaffolding I follow, maybe it is of some help (feedback is very welcome!!).

How do I do this? I prepare Powerpoint presentations, conduct a Computer SIG (Special Interest Group) in my place, and now I will try to deliver a course for teachers...., though not very certain about the response I may have...., as people are also struggling to manage moneywise, another BIG factor which deters many from familiarizing themselves with the machine (the economic situation in this country is a crucial factor at the moment)

And this is just the start. From this, to online teaching, I will still need to prepare myself ;-) ....but the present conditions will surely allow me the time to go on striving, to attain more knowledge and  experience on a commitment I feel I share now with so many great Webheads pushing each other ahead for a common cause.

Welcome again, Scott, to our Webhead World.

My best

Rita

 

 

7Feb03
At 04:36 PM 6/02/2003 +0000, Scott wrote:

>Hello everyone:

><cut>
>
>What would be helpful for a newbie like me, if any of the regulars
>have the time or inclination, is some sort of "getting started"
>testimonial document. I'm sure what I have in mind has already been
>done and I've just not looked hard enough on the various webpages that
>have been referred to recently. But the sort of questions I have in
>mind are: How does a teacher bring about the transformation from f2f
>to online teaching?

Scott,

For what it's with my progression into this field went something like this:

1) first of all I started taking materials from the Net into the classroom
2) next step was to actually take students into a computer room to do web
based activities
3) next step was to get students to build webpages with their own images
and writing (slow and painstaking but worth it in the end)
4) next, get all your students an email account and hook them up with other
students via sites like Dave's ESL Cafe (there are many others these days
6) eventually I started emailing students the day's lesson plan which they
would open and do in self-paced mode
7) around this time I started volunteer online teaching with EFI
(www.study.com) where Vance and Maggi also taught. Even with the skills I
had picked up via integrating the Web into my classroom teaching the true
fully online teaching experience was like jumping in the deep end!

So I guess the way I got started was spending about a year gradually
incorporating the technology into my normal classroom practice. As my
skills and confidence grew, so it did with my students and it became more
and more satisfying. Wherever I am today is the result of many small steps,
and A LOT of assistance from dedicated online colleagues (professional
listservs were invaluable) like Vance, Maggi, and other Webheads. I asked
hundreds of questions for a couple of years and am eternally grateful for
the endless patience of others. I discovered this amazing spirirt of
sharing knowledge on the Internet, which is exemplified by this current WIA
group.

- Michael C.

 

 

Combining 2 threads before going to bed ...

. . .

I would suggest to Scott and others that this is a "way in" to
using technology in the classroom. The first question you need to ask is
WHY? If you're only using the computers because they're there (the old
"why climb Mt Everest" theory), then you might want to take a step back
and think whether you are significantly enhancing your students'
language learning. The Gonzalez article shows how you can use a
computer-based task in a traditional classroom - but it's time
consuming.

I have a task I today on a similar (but simpler) line, but I can't lay
my hands on the links so I'll have to get back to you. It involves the
Guardian from England, VIVA from France and students from China, Turkey
and Japan. In Philadelphia. Now that's what the internet is good at -
chomping up distance at the click of a mouse.

More anon.

Nigel

 

 

Dear Webheads:

. . .

Concerning the topics for this first half of the week, I think that most of us have a pretty good idea of the role that synch and asynch tools can play in language learning. I feel that the major role is making possible authentic practice of the target language whether with native or non-native speakers. Stepping out of the classroom, so to say, and having the world at our fingertips is a major step forward for a language student, or for any student!

Whether these tools are a part of the curriculum or just an add-on depends on different factors such as availability of time and equipment, how confident the teacher feels with the tools, etc. I remember I did my first email exchange as an extracurricular activity with 7 students. I needed to start small and if things went well, I would have wings to fly! And I did.

As to practical uses, I think that many of the things done with email can be done with chat and maybe with greater motivation and enthusiasm, because they are interacting in real time: one-on-one or group interactions, interviews, surveys, collaborative projects and simulations in which different students assume different roles from real life.

During the rest of the week we would like you to share your ideas on:

-- how to organize online sessions with students (Daf and Aiden, you could give us great ideas!);

-- how newbie students can/should be introduced to these tools;

-- pros and cons of using chat, email and any other online tools in language learning.

Hope to hear some interesting experiences and advice!

Teresa, Sus and Rita

 

 

 
9Feb03
Scott wrote:
>How does a teacher bring about the transformation from f2f to online
>teaching? What are some of the obstacles and issues that have been
>encountered in the process? What have been the high lights as well as the
>"low lights" for you as you've made the move?

Hi all,

Others have already posted on this topic raised by Scott. The following may
be interesting too. I happened to see this information forwarded in an OU
alumni community conference:

*****
Please find information about a free course below. For further information
contact Shirley Bennett - S.Bennett@hull.ac.uk

The Centre for Lifelong Learning at the University of Hull is running a
short course intended for practising teachers and trainers of adults and
focussing on "Course Design for eLearning / Online Learning". The course
will run in May / June 2003.  It will be an online course, accessible over
the internet from anywhere in the world, at any time of the day or night
and is open to any teachers or trainers with an interest in Course Design
and/or eLearning. The course is being run as part of a European Leonardo
project (European eTutor) and there will be NO COURSE FEES. For further
information contact Shirley Bennett (Course Leader) on s.bennett@hull.ac.uk.

Andrew G. Holmes
academic co-ordinator lifelong (vocational and work-based) learning, Tel
01482 465429

*****

This free(!) course might be a relevant follow-up on the programme in WIA
week 5 (see Dafne's post "reflections").

I am currently involved myself in another similar international online
course from the University of London (Institute of Education), acting as
the regional tutor for a group of Dutch colleagues. But that one (which is
not free) will only be delivered again next January (2004).

Arnold

P.S. My own experiences, Scott, stretch out over a period of some five to
six years and they have involved subtopics of your main question such as
online course design, student support, quality assurance, assessment. The
approach described by some of the colleagues in their postings seem to
favour a carefully and gradually built-up online presence - taking small
steps and bringing things online 'organically' as it were. Very sound advice.

 

 

9Feb03
Arnold,

Thank you for your latest feedback on the Course Design for eLearning /
Online Learning at the University of Hull and on the Dutch Web site I
referred. Fromwhat I gather from your great overview, there weren't many
effective 'good practices', hopefully, more in terms of good lessons
learned. I agree with your final comment in [] (including your appreciation
for their work). After all, much of what goes into teaching is/should be
common sense and feeling!

Teresa

 

 

7Feb03
Continued from my last post ... Here's the computer lab activity I tried
yesterday in my intermediate/advanced vocab class:

At this web site
http://www.onestopenglish.com/news/Magazine/News/news.htm
(suggested to me by a Webhead ... Tere, perhaps?) you'll find some
recent articles from the Guardian Weekly, the international edition of a
British newspaper. The articles are accompanied by worksheets with vocab
in context questions and - get this - there are 3 levels for each
article (elementary, intermediate, advanced). Having never found that
computers actually reduce the amount of paper I use, I printed out the
article for the students (mixed ability class, so 2 of them had the
intermediate level, 2 had advanced) and had them work through the
exercises. Then, I asked them to post their response to the discussion
question on Phil Benz's Viva international message board:
http://www.ardecol.ac-grenoble.fr/viva/index2.htm
You can read their responses in Viva's "Science Lab" (scroll down until
you see my prompt called "Boycotts").

Some thoughts about the limitations of chat and CMC in general follow in
a separate message. We've had 5 inches of snow overnight and school is
closed (yeah!) so I have rather more time than usual ...

Cheers,
Nigel

 

 

Nigel,

It wasn't me who suggested the Web site (credit where it's due!), but I've
already bookmarked it!

Glad you're sharing with us your most recent computer activities: the first
part was done offline (right?) and the second - posting of comment - online.
I read them and I especially liked the one on 'food poisoning'.

Yes, it is great to have three different levels, isn't it? And it makes so
much easier and saves so much precious time when we find these ready-made
exercises on topics of interest to our students.

I like the Viva home page: maybe a bit too full, but very lively and
colorful!

Nigel, I agree that computers have not reduced the amount of paperwork (and
I've that confirmed somewhere). This year I tried to do all my Computer and
Internet Club activities strictly online both to save on paper (tighter
budgets at school) and to get the students used to the Net environment
a.s.a.p. I had to give up, because most of the times there were connection
problems! :-(

Keep sharing your ideas, Nigel!

Teresa

 

 

 

Updated on 9Feb03

Created 3Feb2003

Teresa Almeida d'Eça

home page

top

Week 3 threads